Tiered pricing

Tiered pricing offers subscriptions at several price points — for example good, better and best — so readers can self-select and a premium tier can anchor the middle option.

Most publishers land on around three tiers.

Why it matters for publishers

A single price forces every reader into one decision: yes or no. Tiers let readers self-select by need and budget, capture more value from your most committed audience, and use a premium option to make the middle tier look like the sensible choice.

How publishers use it in practice

  • Three tiers is the sweet spot; more than four causes decision paralysis.
  • Differentiate on real value — archive access, data, events, multiple seats — not on artificial limits.
  • Anchor with the top tier, design for the middle one, and let the entry tier remove the price objection.
  • Price the annual equivalent of each tier at roughly a two-month discount.

Frequently asked questions about tiered pricing

How many subscription tiers should a publisher offer?
Three for most titles: a straightforward digital tier, a mid tier with added value, and a premium or team tier.
Should tiers differ by content or by features?
Features and access (seats, archive, events, data) are usually safer than fragmenting your journalism, which frustrates readers.

Related

See also

Built for publishers who charge for their work.

Mocono is the paywall & subscriber CRM for digital publishers. Start your 60-day free trial.

← Back to the publisher glossary